Any time an Ambassador of the United States is killed as a rule, it puts Americans to the defense. As an isolated incident, if Americans do not know anything about the personal life of the person, then there is a principal, just as if a piece of land was attacked, or an embassy {or consulate} with no one in it.
Pictures, of what appears to be moments just before or just after his death, show in the science that deals with physio-biological effects of certain thematic topics that might have been at thresholds of what was occurring to the mind --whether they were carried out in the practical level or not is another story-- might not be ones that are directly approved of by the people there, indirectly.
Whether he did, was, is, had a history of the behaviors, rumors circulating, so on so forth, that is not something that straight minded authors feel inclined to investigate into.
Rounding up, incidents such as what occurred surrounding Ambassador Stevens, puts a strain on two camps.
The level of security [i.e. embassy or consulate]. Was it lax? Or was it strong enough according to some technicalities, then deemed lax after the fact? The bottom line is, whatever the level was, it did not result in blockading the attack.
All the way over in Washington DC, pointing the blame to senior level officials in business attire, may also have contradictions of laws that were set in place as long ago as the Founding Fathers, for a more extensive and complex set of reasons.
Positive directive in intention/ camp 1: is protective of the Embassy/consulate staff and the security team, comprised of positions that are close to heart
Positive directive in intention/ camp 2: protective of all senior level officials and ambassadors, embassy and consulate staff, notably those that are credited by some to be at the high echelons regarding the conditions of embassies
When camp 1 is so fueled about that aspect, it can have disagreements with camp 2.
Altogether, the abovementioned paragraphs hit upon issue 1.
Issue 2, without going into detail, as it is still early in the moments after the missile strikes that just occurred in Palestine to make a more comprehensive statement that is based on all the facts involved, is, how justified was the method of a missile strike, and how far it is or is not adherent to international rules of treatment of one another?
In the previous post, it was stated that missile were being fired as a generality, the type of strikes a separate subject, as what was going in the area, meaning Syria-Turkey border, Palestine, and Israel occupied areas.
Issue 3, is the 'name game', reference events like those surrounding the 'Innocence' film earlier this year. The writing you are reading right now is a blog, not a report being officially submitted that requires investigations for word for word fact finding. The name game is played by so many deviant people for many things. Blog writers are going to make the effort to set the or their point, and little gambit strategies of perpetrators in the wrong doing does not detract from it.
Long term strategies looking back, -- ; short term actions ???
Showing posts with label Libya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Libya. Show all posts
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
September 11th. Fear Around and Around? Condolences to Ambassador Stevens.
A rule, even if the person deceased is not one that there is an allegiance to, is to pay respects and condolences.
Whose rule is this? How did the tradition get passed down and eventually the U.S. and many other nations, have their Americanized or 'Westernized' modern attempt of version, of adhering to this rule?
The tradition, as those that already know, and some with some knowledge, would anticipate, is from Prophet Muhammad, the honor he deserves granted to him.
Unfortunately, there are some who live among the people of the earth today that try to paste together messy situations.
There of those of us that know, that there are some living among the people, that make efforts to place scenes of ugliness and violence in the minds of people of peace, and try to capture attention, amongst attempts at other snares.
Here is what is requested; yesterday was September 11th; many in America hold this day with an amount of sentiment, over the events which occurred the same date in 2001; it is noticed that there was a blaring incident involving violence, reference Consulate in Libya, on the same date of the year in different year; when attempts at mockery are made about those that try, and strive, to make certain that lives are the fairest they can get it for all:
Do not make a mockery. The reason, because when whoever does make the mockery, it only shows that there are reasons, such as for violent acts, that are down beneath and separate from the dignity of Prophet Muhammad, revenge for loved ones, or a basis that comes from a true belief, as in a belief in the Creator.
Whether the September 11th 2012 events were in any way an attempt at mockery about those that made effort for a more peaceful world after September 11, 2001, might not ever be clear.
Question is asked, and also who condolences are stated here along with the other Americans that died in the Consulate in Libya incident, J. Christopher Stevens, did Stevens write the script of the trailer/ movie 'The Innocence of Muslims'/ 'Desert Warrior'?
Second question is, why is the following:
"According to The Wall Street Journal, Bacile said he raised $5 million from about 100 Jewish donors to make the two-hour movie in California last year. Based on the trailer, the movie appears to have been produced on a low budget."
"Terry Jones, the Florida pastor whose Quran-burning last year sparked deadly riots in Afghanistan, said he had been contacted to help distribute the film."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/anti-islam-film/index.html
What was the purpose of it?
Is it the case that just because fund-raising for a film occurred somewhere, that the entire country which the fund-raising occurred in, should be held responsible for the film?
Does everyone involved with the Innocence movie, for and against, remember that the procedural actions to take when making having the intent of halting a film or literary composed matter, involves peaceful means put first?
"The Wall Street Journal identified the filmmaker as Sam Bacile, an Israeli-American real estate developer. The Journal reported that, in its telephone interview with Bacile, he characterized his film as "a political effort to call attention to the hypocrisies of Islam."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/anti-islam-film/index.html
On the point of 'hypocrisies', what, in that statement forms the right and left, the ethical and unethical, of what would form hypocrisies?
Usually when hypocrisies are discussed, it is in the relation to the Quran, Injeel or Bible, or Torah. Now go and see the exact precise truth of the purest form of the original words of the Quran, Injeel or Bible, or Torah. This is something that everyone and anyone can do. What hypocrisies really exist after this examination is made?
Whose rule is this? How did the tradition get passed down and eventually the U.S. and many other nations, have their Americanized or 'Westernized' modern attempt of version, of adhering to this rule?
The tradition, as those that already know, and some with some knowledge, would anticipate, is from Prophet Muhammad, the honor he deserves granted to him.
Unfortunately, there are some who live among the people of the earth today that try to paste together messy situations.
There of those of us that know, that there are some living among the people, that make efforts to place scenes of ugliness and violence in the minds of people of peace, and try to capture attention, amongst attempts at other snares.
Here is what is requested; yesterday was September 11th; many in America hold this day with an amount of sentiment, over the events which occurred the same date in 2001; it is noticed that there was a blaring incident involving violence, reference Consulate in Libya, on the same date of the year in different year; when attempts at mockery are made about those that try, and strive, to make certain that lives are the fairest they can get it for all:
Do not make a mockery. The reason, because when whoever does make the mockery, it only shows that there are reasons, such as for violent acts, that are down beneath and separate from the dignity of Prophet Muhammad, revenge for loved ones, or a basis that comes from a true belief, as in a belief in the Creator.
Whether the September 11th 2012 events were in any way an attempt at mockery about those that made effort for a more peaceful world after September 11, 2001, might not ever be clear.
Question is asked, and also who condolences are stated here along with the other Americans that died in the Consulate in Libya incident, J. Christopher Stevens, did Stevens write the script of the trailer/ movie 'The Innocence of Muslims'/ 'Desert Warrior'?
Second question is, why is the following:
"According to The Wall Street Journal, Bacile said he raised $5 million from about 100 Jewish donors to make the two-hour movie in California last year. Based on the trailer, the movie appears to have been produced on a low budget."
"Terry Jones, the Florida pastor whose Quran-burning last year sparked deadly riots in Afghanistan, said he had been contacted to help distribute the film."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/anti-islam-film/index.html
What was the purpose of it?
Is it the case that just because fund-raising for a film occurred somewhere, that the entire country which the fund-raising occurred in, should be held responsible for the film?
Does everyone involved with the Innocence movie, for and against, remember that the procedural actions to take when making having the intent of halting a film or literary composed matter, involves peaceful means put first?
"The Wall Street Journal identified the filmmaker as Sam Bacile, an Israeli-American real estate developer. The Journal reported that, in its telephone interview with Bacile, he characterized his film as "a political effort to call attention to the hypocrisies of Islam."
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/anti-islam-film/index.html
On the point of 'hypocrisies', what, in that statement forms the right and left, the ethical and unethical, of what would form hypocrisies?
Usually when hypocrisies are discussed, it is in the relation to the Quran, Injeel or Bible, or Torah. Now go and see the exact precise truth of the purest form of the original words of the Quran, Injeel or Bible, or Torah. This is something that everyone and anyone can do. What hypocrisies really exist after this examination is made?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
