12 12 12 a day of technology heights. Have we done it?
We all know that yes, we have gone far, but, compared to where we could be, we could have been much further.
Referencing just what are some of the underpinnings, and their underpinnings of the financial challenges, that have almost 'got us'?
Could these problems been avoided, if certain actions or non-actions were carried forth?
What is being talked about here?/: Allocation for schools and education, INSTEAD of ______
This is amongst a few. Another:
The real estate and house value dip, and lowering, if the effort to prevent it had more strength in the strong arm efforts so that it would never have been, could it have been avoided?
There is not going to be another 12 12 12 until 12 12 20---. There will not be another shot to get on the track some say we needed some say we wanted to be on.
There will be other dates, 3 3 13 and 11 12 13 --just a thought. Let's look to those historic dates as of now are in the future, at show at the level they are worthy of.
Volumes can already be written about the 'fiscal cliff' that we are dealing with as 2012 closes out. Good that solutions have been developed. However, the nature of a fiscal cliff, which in itself is not in some aspects a good thing, because we did have to take the time to deal with it and develop mechanism to face the challenge, warns us, that, in the future, if we are not ALWAYS AND CONSTANTLY working towards the best of economic conditions, that we could approach a next time, and if there is a next time, the situation might be worse. Let us have it learned, and there will not be a next time. There are goals that are more elevated in the light of the fiscal cliff should've never been.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Headline is Pushed to Include the Word 'Issues': Deceased Ambassador Stevens, Correlations; and Missile Strikes
Any time an Ambassador of the United States is killed as a rule, it puts Americans to the defense. As an isolated incident, if Americans do not know anything about the personal life of the person, then there is a principal, just as if a piece of land was attacked, or an embassy {or consulate} with no one in it.
Pictures, of what appears to be moments just before or just after his death, show in the science that deals with physio-biological effects of certain thematic topics that might have been at thresholds of what was occurring to the mind --whether they were carried out in the practical level or not is another story-- might not be ones that are directly approved of by the people there, indirectly.
Whether he did, was, is, had a history of the behaviors, rumors circulating, so on so forth, that is not something that straight minded authors feel inclined to investigate into.
Rounding up, incidents such as what occurred surrounding Ambassador Stevens, puts a strain on two camps.
The level of security [i.e. embassy or consulate]. Was it lax? Or was it strong enough according to some technicalities, then deemed lax after the fact? The bottom line is, whatever the level was, it did not result in blockading the attack.
All the way over in Washington DC, pointing the blame to senior level officials in business attire, may also have contradictions of laws that were set in place as long ago as the Founding Fathers, for a more extensive and complex set of reasons.
Positive directive in intention/ camp 1: is protective of the Embassy/consulate staff and the security team, comprised of positions that are close to heart
Positive directive in intention/ camp 2: protective of all senior level officials and ambassadors, embassy and consulate staff, notably those that are credited by some to be at the high echelons regarding the conditions of embassies
When camp 1 is so fueled about that aspect, it can have disagreements with camp 2.
Altogether, the abovementioned paragraphs hit upon issue 1.
Issue 2, without going into detail, as it is still early in the moments after the missile strikes that just occurred in Palestine to make a more comprehensive statement that is based on all the facts involved, is, how justified was the method of a missile strike, and how far it is or is not adherent to international rules of treatment of one another?
In the previous post, it was stated that missile were being fired as a generality, the type of strikes a separate subject, as what was going in the area, meaning Syria-Turkey border, Palestine, and Israel occupied areas.
Issue 3, is the 'name game', reference events like those surrounding the 'Innocence' film earlier this year. The writing you are reading right now is a blog, not a report being officially submitted that requires investigations for word for word fact finding. The name game is played by so many deviant people for many things. Blog writers are going to make the effort to set the or their point, and little gambit strategies of perpetrators in the wrong doing does not detract from it.
Long term strategies looking back, -- ; short term actions ???
Pictures, of what appears to be moments just before or just after his death, show in the science that deals with physio-biological effects of certain thematic topics that might have been at thresholds of what was occurring to the mind --whether they were carried out in the practical level or not is another story-- might not be ones that are directly approved of by the people there, indirectly.
Whether he did, was, is, had a history of the behaviors, rumors circulating, so on so forth, that is not something that straight minded authors feel inclined to investigate into.
Rounding up, incidents such as what occurred surrounding Ambassador Stevens, puts a strain on two camps.
The level of security [i.e. embassy or consulate]. Was it lax? Or was it strong enough according to some technicalities, then deemed lax after the fact? The bottom line is, whatever the level was, it did not result in blockading the attack.
All the way over in Washington DC, pointing the blame to senior level officials in business attire, may also have contradictions of laws that were set in place as long ago as the Founding Fathers, for a more extensive and complex set of reasons.
Positive directive in intention/ camp 1: is protective of the Embassy/consulate staff and the security team, comprised of positions that are close to heart
Positive directive in intention/ camp 2: protective of all senior level officials and ambassadors, embassy and consulate staff, notably those that are credited by some to be at the high echelons regarding the conditions of embassies
When camp 1 is so fueled about that aspect, it can have disagreements with camp 2.
Altogether, the abovementioned paragraphs hit upon issue 1.
Issue 2, without going into detail, as it is still early in the moments after the missile strikes that just occurred in Palestine to make a more comprehensive statement that is based on all the facts involved, is, how justified was the method of a missile strike, and how far it is or is not adherent to international rules of treatment of one another?
In the previous post, it was stated that missile were being fired as a generality, the type of strikes a separate subject, as what was going in the area, meaning Syria-Turkey border, Palestine, and Israel occupied areas.
Issue 3, is the 'name game', reference events like those surrounding the 'Innocence' film earlier this year. The writing you are reading right now is a blog, not a report being officially submitted that requires investigations for word for word fact finding. The name game is played by so many deviant people for many things. Blog writers are going to make the effort to set the or their point, and little gambit strategies of perpetrators in the wrong doing does not detract from it.
Long term strategies looking back, -- ; short term actions ???
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Syria and Turkey and Israel are Bombing and Missile Striking at the Same Time. Edited Post and Title on 9/17/2013.
An outrage:
Near and during the Hajj season
events which for some reason have not been gaining much headline news over here in the United States
--there has been some, but ostensibly sporadic--, you have to look for it to find it,
the way it has been handled insofar coverage of the stories is already suspect;
because any other time when there is an opportunity to condescend the Arab world as a result of infighting, it is smeared all over every headline for every moment
Concerning matter, is U.S. troops are on 'just in case' standby status to get involved in Syria
Getting involved with Syria should not be looked at as just another situation, place and geographic region that application of military skill can be exercised
Getting involved in a place like Syria that has a historically many holy dimensions of it, might automatically result in whoever gets involved to be condescended in other ways by the Arab World
That is why hurrying to involvement, {is being talked about} nevermind coming up with a strategy to justify involvement that involves acting wry
Once again, over here in America, the press has to take time off from what they are doing to keep our homeland on the up and up, like repairing from Hurricane Sandy,
and pay attention to the build-up of a situation that is shame on the Arab World
Here is the list of a few:
And who said there is a Civil War going on Syria?
----Comments, edits, and revisions placed September 17, 2013 about this question asked here of 'who said there is Civil War?':
Included in the general definition of civil war, according to dictionaries in the U.S., is a war that is between citizens of the same country.
On a technicality, insofar whomever the following statement has as referent, are citizens of the same country,
"We are in a state of real war, in every aspect of the words, and when we're in a state of war, all of our politics has to be concentrated on winning this war," President Bashar al-Assad told his new Cabinet during a speech about the economy and domestic issues in which he called for unity to make the country strong."
source: http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/26/world/meast/syria-unrest
Al-Assad: 'We're in a state of war'
By the CNN Wire Staff
updated 9:18 PM EDT, Tue June 26, 2012
Technicalities in consideration of all the facts, such as, are all parties fighting actually doing so fully in capacity as citizens of the country, and are they being impelled purely by motives that have to do with what is for the country, and their motive coming from, from the country, and many dimensions along this line, might result in depictions.
Is or was the state of affairs when this post was written, more accurately, war, and not necessarily civil war?
Assad said according to the source, it is drawn from, "We are in a state of real war".
The source the statement it is drawn from, same source above, http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/26/world/meast/syria-unrest, did not verbatim say civil war.
The distinguishing of the source the statement is drawn from, from his exact statement, is to leave room for possible translations, dialects and colloquial meanings.
See for further reading at the bottom of this post, for more on the subject.
----end of September 17, 2013 comment
----September 17, 2013 revised statement:
Forthrightly what is being referred to here is the unethical misuse of violence and strife, for the purpose of further unethical violence.
----end of September 17, 2013 revised statement----
Cover stories here, there, then don't cover stories here, there, time it, okay, that's enough based on what's on the news, do something dangerously reckless, and get yourself and others hurt in ways far beyond what you've ever thought of before --that's what sits on the ledge of potential capable imminent to unfold
--like a bird sitting on the edge of a rooftop, waiting to...
And, Syria and Turkey are going back and forth, missile strikes, bombing, and at the same time, Israeli missiles are striking targets in the same area, these shots some press says are one in the same with warning shots
--low notes: is it a safe guess that Israel must be on Turkey's side, Turkey on the 'side' of Israel respective of the Syria situation, like in cartoons of soldiers meant for 7 year olds to watch?
Golan Heights area
All of this is just an initial inhale of the situation, not even an analysis or study of the situation
More in-depth studies might be provided in the upcoming future
'Since '73'
What about since the Ottoman Empire
Who else is sitting perched?
-----end of original article in blog post written 2012-----
For further reading:
1.
What Is Civil War?
Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition
Nicholas Sambanis
Department of Political Science, Yale University
Abstract
"...Without ad hoc rules to code its start and end and differentiate it from other violence, it is difficult, if not impossible, to define and measure civil war. A wide range of variation in parameter estimates makes accurate predictions of war onset difficult, and differences in empirical results are greater with respect to war continuation."
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/48/6/814.abstract
2.
civil war
Definition
Armed conflict between a government and another group from within the same country.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/civil-war.html
What does 'from' in the definition here mean, when for example, if there are people in the country fighting against another party, but the former are not originally from the country, take for instance mercenaries, or trouble-makers?
3.
Over a 1000 people died, and at least a 100 from each side, point of scholastic assessments, in consideration; then, what were the time windows, for instance, over a 1000 people killed over the course of 500 years in a case of empires in Europe, the 1000 people averages to 2 persons per year; is that rate, of 2 deaths a year, commonly perceived as civil war?
4.
Looking at the statement, "We are in a state of real war",
Who or what was being referred to, reference "concentrated on winning", winning over who, a group of fully recognized citizens in Syria, or a broader situation that extends beyond the borders of the country, or a combination of events, and angles such as these, or, these aside, what was said to who was being talked to, was the purview, whereat it is not appropriate to try to speculate inappropriately?
5.
Do terrorists comprise an entity that when fighting them, the fighting that emerges should be considered civil war?
6.
Based on what Syrian President Assad said in an interview with Charlie Rose within recent weeks thereabout, September 2013, included in what his regime has been contending with recently is Al Qaeda.
Near and during the Hajj season
events which for some reason have not been gaining much headline news over here in the United States
--there has been some, but ostensibly sporadic--, you have to look for it to find it,
the way it has been handled insofar coverage of the stories is already suspect;
because any other time when there is an opportunity to condescend the Arab world as a result of infighting, it is smeared all over every headline for every moment
Concerning matter, is U.S. troops are on 'just in case' standby status to get involved in Syria
Getting involved with Syria should not be looked at as just another situation, place and geographic region that application of military skill can be exercised
Getting involved in a place like Syria that has a historically many holy dimensions of it, might automatically result in whoever gets involved to be condescended in other ways by the Arab World
That is why hurrying to involvement, {is being talked about} nevermind coming up with a strategy to justify involvement that involves acting wry
Once again, over here in America, the press has to take time off from what they are doing to keep our homeland on the up and up, like repairing from Hurricane Sandy,
and pay attention to the build-up of a situation that is shame on the Arab World
Here is the list of a few:
- Syrian people are being killed
- Turkish people are being killed
- Akcakale
- Involved now are other countries voicing their positions, --does it help reduce casualty?-- remote string attached to 'in the picture', is what is being referred to here, Qatar is making statements according to news sites
And who said there is a Civil War going on Syria?
----Comments, edits, and revisions placed September 17, 2013 about this question asked here of 'who said there is Civil War?':
Included in the general definition of civil war, according to dictionaries in the U.S., is a war that is between citizens of the same country.
On a technicality, insofar whomever the following statement has as referent, are citizens of the same country,
"We are in a state of real war, in every aspect of the words, and when we're in a state of war, all of our politics has to be concentrated on winning this war," President Bashar al-Assad told his new Cabinet during a speech about the economy and domestic issues in which he called for unity to make the country strong."
source: http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/26/world/meast/syria-unrest
Al-Assad: 'We're in a state of war'
By the CNN Wire Staff
updated 9:18 PM EDT, Tue June 26, 2012
Technicalities in consideration of all the facts, such as, are all parties fighting actually doing so fully in capacity as citizens of the country, and are they being impelled purely by motives that have to do with what is for the country, and their motive coming from, from the country, and many dimensions along this line, might result in depictions.
Is or was the state of affairs when this post was written, more accurately, war, and not necessarily civil war?
Assad said according to the source, it is drawn from, "We are in a state of real war".
The source the statement it is drawn from, same source above, http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/26/world/meast/syria-unrest, did not verbatim say civil war.
The distinguishing of the source the statement is drawn from, from his exact statement, is to leave room for possible translations, dialects and colloquial meanings.
See for further reading at the bottom of this post, for more on the subject.
----end of September 17, 2013 comment
----September 17, 2013 revised statement:
Forthrightly what is being referred to here is the unethical misuse of violence and strife, for the purpose of further unethical violence.
----end of September 17, 2013 revised statement----
Cover stories here, there, then don't cover stories here, there, time it, okay, that's enough based on what's on the news, do something dangerously reckless, and get yourself and others hurt in ways far beyond what you've ever thought of before --that's what sits on the ledge of potential capable imminent to unfold
--like a bird sitting on the edge of a rooftop, waiting to...
And, Syria and Turkey are going back and forth, missile strikes, bombing, and at the same time, Israeli missiles are striking targets in the same area, these shots some press says are one in the same with warning shots
--low notes: is it a safe guess that Israel must be on Turkey's side, Turkey on the 'side' of Israel respective of the Syria situation, like in cartoons of soldiers meant for 7 year olds to watch?
Golan Heights area
All of this is just an initial inhale of the situation, not even an analysis or study of the situation
More in-depth studies might be provided in the upcoming future
'Since '73'
What about since the Ottoman Empire
Who else is sitting perched?
-----end of original article in blog post written 2012-----
For further reading:
1.
What Is Civil War?
Conceptual and Empirical Complexities of an Operational Definition
Nicholas Sambanis
Department of Political Science, Yale University
Abstract
"...Without ad hoc rules to code its start and end and differentiate it from other violence, it is difficult, if not impossible, to define and measure civil war. A wide range of variation in parameter estimates makes accurate predictions of war onset difficult, and differences in empirical results are greater with respect to war continuation."
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/48/6/814.abstract
2.
civil war
Definition
Armed conflict between a government and another group from within the same country.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/civil-war.html
What does 'from' in the definition here mean, when for example, if there are people in the country fighting against another party, but the former are not originally from the country, take for instance mercenaries, or trouble-makers?
3.
Over a 1000 people died, and at least a 100 from each side, point of scholastic assessments, in consideration; then, what were the time windows, for instance, over a 1000 people killed over the course of 500 years in a case of empires in Europe, the 1000 people averages to 2 persons per year; is that rate, of 2 deaths a year, commonly perceived as civil war?
4.
Looking at the statement, "We are in a state of real war",
Who or what was being referred to, reference "concentrated on winning", winning over who, a group of fully recognized citizens in Syria, or a broader situation that extends beyond the borders of the country, or a combination of events, and angles such as these, or, these aside, what was said to who was being talked to, was the purview, whereat it is not appropriate to try to speculate inappropriately?
5.
Do terrorists comprise an entity that when fighting them, the fighting that emerges should be considered civil war?
6.
Based on what Syrian President Assad said in an interview with Charlie Rose within recent weeks thereabout, September 2013, included in what his regime has been contending with recently is Al Qaeda.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
America * Move Ahead to the Light, in Consideration the 2012 Presidential Election is Over
Moving forward, moving ahead
Now that the Presidential Election of 2012 is behind us, --barring no post-election vote count commotion--, let not the vagaries of why the race seemed to be so tight, from psychological perspectives, distract America and Americans from the light that could be ahead.
And the same for disillusioned myth predictions and fairy tales of what America might undergo in the next few years; that we do not get distracted unduly for this thing.
Join us to make America a better place.
Now that the Presidential Election of 2012 is behind us, --barring no post-election vote count commotion--, let not the vagaries of why the race seemed to be so tight, from psychological perspectives, distract America and Americans from the light that could be ahead.
And the same for disillusioned myth predictions and fairy tales of what America might undergo in the next few years; that we do not get distracted unduly for this thing.
Join us to make America a better place.
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
STRONG Recommendations in the Storm Sandy Aftermath: Solar on Street Lamps, and Uninterrupted Power Supply for Offices
Not to place anything above the loss of life, as there is a blog posting just previous to this one
Not to capitalize on loss of life, such as for monetary earnings
It is IMPORTANT
in the prevention of further loss of life,
and that there stands the possibility that some people that died could have been rescued, if:
The street lamps that lost lighting power due the storm, could still shine some light
A recommendation has been placed in ETIS International blogs before, to place some kind of solar panel mechanism attached to street lamps, at least in some places, so that
EMERGENCY CREWS CAN SEE WHERE THEY ARE GOING AT NIGHT.
VALUABLE TIME TO SAVE LIVES OCCURS AT NIGHT JUST LIKE THE DAY.
Unlit street lamps because a storm came through is a thing of the past, in the age of antiquity.
Uninterrupted Power Supply, also known as/ abbreviated UPS
of course can be used in offices which can be used for communicating and coordinating emergency efforts and management. If the offices have no power, then how can they be used to make needed emergency calls.
You spot a stranded person in a flood from your office while looking out the window from your high rise office, condo, or apartment, and your cellular phone is not getting any signal; you can e-mail someone, or call using a phone attached to your computer, but you can't do that because your power is lost due to the storm...
It does not have to be. UPS systems can keep power supply running for hours, just like a generator. Make those valuable calls. The next time a severe tide of weather hits, if there is a next time, instead of 39 lost, how about some other number, lower.
Well over 5 million power outages on the East Coast alone blamed on the storm named Sandy. That could be turned around, and 5 million assisting with the assistance effort.
You can get UPS systems through ETISworld.com or ETISmart.com
Direct UPS Uninterrupted Power Supply page: http://etismart.com/power-supply-ups-and-backup.php
Not to capitalize on loss of life, such as for monetary earnings
It is IMPORTANT
in the prevention of further loss of life,
and that there stands the possibility that some people that died could have been rescued, if:
The street lamps that lost lighting power due the storm, could still shine some light
A recommendation has been placed in ETIS International blogs before, to place some kind of solar panel mechanism attached to street lamps, at least in some places, so that
EMERGENCY CREWS CAN SEE WHERE THEY ARE GOING AT NIGHT.
VALUABLE TIME TO SAVE LIVES OCCURS AT NIGHT JUST LIKE THE DAY.
Unlit street lamps because a storm came through is a thing of the past, in the age of antiquity.
Uninterrupted Power Supply, also known as/ abbreviated UPS
of course can be used in offices which can be used for communicating and coordinating emergency efforts and management. If the offices have no power, then how can they be used to make needed emergency calls.
You spot a stranded person in a flood from your office while looking out the window from your high rise office, condo, or apartment, and your cellular phone is not getting any signal; you can e-mail someone, or call using a phone attached to your computer, but you can't do that because your power is lost due to the storm...
It does not have to be. UPS systems can keep power supply running for hours, just like a generator. Make those valuable calls. The next time a severe tide of weather hits, if there is a next time, instead of 39 lost, how about some other number, lower.
Well over 5 million power outages on the East Coast alone blamed on the storm named Sandy. That could be turned around, and 5 million assisting with the assistance effort.
You can get UPS systems through ETISworld.com or ETISmart.com
Direct UPS Uninterrupted Power Supply page: http://etismart.com/power-supply-ups-and-backup.php
Hurricane Sandy Takes Tolls. New York and New Jersey Hit Hard by Hurricane Sandy ||:New News About the Two News|
39 people are reported dead in the continental U.S. as result of Hurricane Sandy.
There are areas of New Jersey that are still not able to be identified as to what exactly the extent of the damage is, and possibly other human injuries. 2.5 million power outages [for New Jersey per CBSnews.com today].
Same source also says 2.3 million power outages in New York, and 1.2 million power outages in Pennsylvania.
Equipment for locating trapped people in storm water inundated [flooded] areas, that are high tech and effective, might help, if help is needed.
In the Caribbean, almost 70 people are reported to have died as resultant of hurricane Sandy.
There are areas of New Jersey that are still not able to be identified as to what exactly the extent of the damage is, and possibly other human injuries. 2.5 million power outages [for New Jersey per CBSnews.com today].
Same source also says 2.3 million power outages in New York, and 1.2 million power outages in Pennsylvania.
Equipment for locating trapped people in storm water inundated [flooded] areas, that are high tech and effective, might help, if help is needed.
In the Caribbean, almost 70 people are reported to have died as resultant of hurricane Sandy.
Friday, October 26, 2012
Sandy? A Hurricane Named Sandy Arriving at this Time of Year?
Not to invoke any further this hurricane they call Sandy arriving, but Sandy is not really a name befitting for a weather condition that has destructive effects this time of year
As millions are over in Mecca on Hajj
The Mid-Atlantic region in the area around Washington D.C. is concerned about a boomerang-shaped weather pattern moving from south to north rumored to have the prospect of materializing into a severe hurricane
Look to the good side of things, as the name is not befitting, the nature of the name is not befitting, so to will the storm not hit us
Not working today, therefore am not, but am putting the information out
Let us all be the best, and hope for the best
As millions are over in Mecca on Hajj
The Mid-Atlantic region in the area around Washington D.C. is concerned about a boomerang-shaped weather pattern moving from south to north rumored to have the prospect of materializing into a severe hurricane
Look to the good side of things, as the name is not befitting, the nature of the name is not befitting, so to will the storm not hit us
Not working today, therefore am not, but am putting the information out
Let us all be the best, and hope for the best
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
